News RSS Feed


Eco village refused

10:55am Tuesday 9th October 2007

comment Comments (2)   Have your say »


An application for a low-impact eco-village was refused by county council planners this morning.

Plans for nine-eco smallholdings at Pont-y-Gafel, Glandwr, were discussed at today's planning meeting.

Lammas Low Impact Initiatives Ltd applied for nine eco-smallholdings, which would feature renewable energy, and produce goods from the land. They also hope to include a campsite and community building on the 31 hectare site.

The application is the first of its kind to be considered under a new low-impact policy, but has been recommended for refusal because it failed to meet aspects of the stringent criteria.

A report to the planning committee stated: "There is some doubt that the proposal will provide sufficient livelihood and substantially meet the needs of residents.

"The type, number and construction of buildings in terms of labour and technical expertise are not considered to be low impact.

The report added: "They set a target for achieving self sufficiency at five years rather than the three years required. No justification is given for the longer target date."

There were also concerns about the impact on the local road network and the landscape, and possible adverse effects on the local community.

Speaking after the meeting applicant Paul Wimbush said: "We're disappointed of course, but this was not completely unexpected given the nature of the policy, and the application is cutting edge.

"I'm happy that what we are proposing will make an over all positive contribution socially, environmentally and economically.

"The message we will take back is that we need to work on our traffic and business plans.

"We have been working in this application for two years and it is tailor made to fit the policy.

"We will come bouncing back again with the information that they have requested and resubmit the application."


Your Say YourWestern Telegraph

Jane Bell, says...
12:50pm Thu 11 Oct 07

I suspect that if this was given planning permission then in a few years there would be several "failed" small-holdings which will then revert to homes with land - one of the most expensive types of property on the market. If they are eco-friendly then why are they so far from schools, shops, etc, which presuppose car travel - that's not very eco, is it?

Dave H, says...
11:35am Sun 28 Oct 07

"presuppose car travel - that's not very eco, is it?"

This kind of closed-minded, better-not-to-tax-my
-brain-about-it thinking is why there are so many cars about today. Eco-friendly travel is possible through electric vehicles, group transport from mini-buses and even, heaven forbid, the use of public transport.

An eco-village is about sharing; about improving efficiencies and reducing footprints. An eco-village is not a dreamchild of a group of money hungry consumers who have decided they can make a quick buck through ""failed" small-holdings which will then revert to homes with land ", but a group of people who's focus in on reducing the human ecological footprint.

I think the refusal of the application at this stage is a benefit to everyone. It puts the issue back in the press; it highlights the stringent requirements for other applications to meet; and it gives Lammas a chance to strengthen their thinking in areas that required greater clarity.

Wales, and the UK, cannot afford for this application to fail, and I wish Lammas the best of 'luck' in their next application.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »