News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Pembrokeshire County Council cabinet refers parking charges to scrutiny committee

Controversial moves to introduce brand new car parking charges in recession struck Pembrokeshire towns will be referred to the council's environment overview and scrutiny committee.

Pembrokeshire County Council's cabinet members heard today (Monday) how the proposal to increase charges in some car parks and introduce new charges in Fishguard, Pembroke, Narberth, Newport, Pembroke Dock, Milford Haven and Tenby, were initially put to cabinet in July 2006.

At the same time small increases in existing car parking charges were suggested.

Since then the proposal has come before the overview and scrutiny committee and an extensive report, the Buchanan Report, was produced in 2007.

Deputy leader with responsibility for highways and planning, Jamie Adams, introduced the proposals.

He said that car parking charges would allow far better management of town centres and far more effective footfall through businesses in the town centres. He maintained that civil parking enforcement for on street car parking had to go hand in hand with better use of the county's car parks.

He argued that Pembrokeshire's car parking charges, even at the proposed increased rate, compared very favourably to neighbouring counties and that there had been no increases in existing charges for 15 years.

"I remain convinced that car parking charges are more than reasonable and will provide an effective future for car parking within the authority," he said.

His cabinet colleagues agreed with him, deciding to implement the small increases, subject to the statutory consultation process, but referring the new charges back to the overview and scrutiny committee.

Deputy Leader, Councillor John Allen Mirehouse, said he thought that the introduction of new charges was "an opportunity to get even and fair car parking principles through the whole county".

Councillor Sian James was also in favour but was concerned that it would limit opportunities to get out for the elderly.

She also questioned why the council had not followed all the recommendations of the Buchanan Report , citing the fact that the report recommended that charges be introduced in Fishguard after the new super market is built.

Council leader John Davies acknowledged that car parking charges were always going to be unpopular.

"Now we are in deep recession," he said. "However, it will never be the right time to do something with car parking charges other than to get rid of them once an for all.

"We need more car parks and they have to be funded somehow. It is not our statutory responsibility to provide them."

He acknowledged that the new charges were a "huge issue" and recommended referring it back to the overview and scrutiny and consulting on level of charges. He said that there would be an opportunity to discuss why some aspects of the report had not been taken up at the overview and scrutiny committee.

"All local members will have right to speak in overview and scrutiny," he said. "However, we must promise ourselves this does not take another four years."

Comments(3)

Pembrokeshire says...
5:10pm Mon 7 Sep 09

The motorist seem to get hit all the time,petrol,road fund now parking it will get to the stage the small businesses in Pembrokeshire will suffer.Everyone will travel to the supermarkets as its free parking or start shopping on-line more.Then where will the money come from (higher council tax )

pdanon says...
2:51pm Tue 8 Sep 09

Whilst, I think, we all knew the car parking charges / increase were going to come sooner or later, the Buchanon Report refers to trading conditions 3 years ago and whilst conditions were not that great then, they certainly have declined / deteriorated even more since. The demise of Town Centres generally has continued to drop, and should these car parking charges / proposals go ahead, it will only increase the income for the large supermarkets even more and rape the small local independent trader of what little income they have managed to maintain. Where is the level playing field, I certainly do not see one.

indeview says...
11:49am Fri 11 Sep 09

The report so carefully considered by the Cabinet makes no attempt to explain the purpose of the proposed increases and introduction of new car parking charges, or to justify them.

At the meeting reported comments were:-
"There have been no increases in charges for 15 Years".
In the current financial year the estimated "profit" in on car parking charges is £70,000 (+10.2%) of costs at present levels. ( Toll Bridge charges have remained the same as well)

"More car parks have to be funded and we need more".
The money side of these proposals isn't referred to at all in the report. How much extra is estimated to be raised? What will it be used for? Will these charges meet the perceived need and purpose for increased income?

Precisely how will these charges "allow better management of town centres and more effective footfall through businesses there" as claimed by Cllr. Adams?
This objective isn't explained, mentioned or even referred to in the report considered by Cabinet. Is there a hidden agenda?

Cabinet called for a review to specifically consider the impact of increased charges on retail trade. Nothing in the report even hints at the effect, although an out of date final report is alluded to.

On the basis of information in the report, how could any reasonable person consider imposing increased, and introducing new, charges?
Why do we bother to elect councillors if they are minded to blindly accept recommendations of unelected officers?

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree