MPs to meet minister over Mustang Marine collapse report

The opening of the new Mustang Marine boat building construction hall in November. PICTURE: Martin Cavaney Photography.

The opening of the new Mustang Marine boat building construction hall in November. PICTURE: Martin Cavaney Photography.

First published in County News

PEMBROKESHIRE MPs are to meet with the minister for transport tomorrow (Thursday) to discuss a report into the collapse of the Pembroke Dock boat building company Mustang Marine.

Mustang entered administration in March.

Both its Pembroke Dock boat-building operation and the Milford Haven dry dock were bought out of administration at the end of May.

But 71 Pembrokeshire businesses are still owed money - nearly £600,000 in total according to a list of creditors dated March 3. Many have since questioned how the Port, as a 50% shareholder, could not be held responsible for its debts.

It has now emerged that the minister for transport Stephen Hammond MP requested a report into the firm’s collapse from the Port Authority chairman Peter Jones, due to be discussed tomorrow.

Pembrokeshire MPs Simon Hart and Stephen Crabb will be at the meeting.

“This is the first opportunity we have got to go through the report, to talk about what went wrong, who was responsible, why mistakes were made, which procedures were followed and which weren’t,” said Mr Hart.

“This is the opportunity we have been looking for, for the Port Authority to be absolutely clear about what happened. There are some quite significant questions which need answering.

“A significant amount of public money has gone down the swanny on this and a lot of people are owed a lot of money, this needs more than an exercise in ‘lessons learned’.”

According to Mr Hart, there are three issues at stake – the Port’s integrity and reputation among local and non-local investors, the money owed to businesses, and the relationship between Mustang and the Port.

It is not known whether the report will be made public but Mr Hart said he would ask the question.

“This has not done the reputation of the Port Authority any good and they need to repair that reputation – they won’t do that with a bland, secretive report,” he said.

“They need to be upfront and if mistakes have been made own up to them.”

Mr Hart has written to Mr Hammond outlining some of his concerns. These include whether Mustang is a “subsidiary” of the Port – something the Port has always denied – and why action was not taken sooner as the company’s debts rose into the millions.

He also questioned whether there was a conflict of interest between Port officials and the investment decisions taken, and why “due diligence was so poorly carried out” in a “deteriorating industry”.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:26pm Wed 2 Jul 14

Gogledd says...

And a lot more public money will go down the swanny, again and again on grants for businesses that are no goers in the first place.......money for old rope....Before planning is given the WG should try to ensure that the business is viable at the moment anyone can apply it seems without safeguards being put in place that the money they receive is going to a business that has genuine business on its books and that if the venture is funded that it will be a success. I know its difficult sometimes but when giving planning for large developments its never taken into consideration whether or not its a viable business venture....often all that hinges on obtaining a grant is the successfull planning application...I wonder whether or not Marstons has actually bought into a viable business opportunity at Pembroke Dock Marina...which is shrinking significantly in scale as the costs escalate...
And a lot more public money will go down the swanny, again and again on grants for businesses that are no goers in the first place.......money for old rope....Before planning is given the WG should try to ensure that the business is viable at the moment anyone can apply it seems without safeguards being put in place that the money they receive is going to a business that has genuine business on its books and that if the venture is funded that it will be a success. I know its difficult sometimes but when giving planning for large developments its never taken into consideration whether or not its a viable business venture....often all that hinges on obtaining a grant is the successfull planning application...I wonder whether or not Marstons has actually bought into a viable business opportunity at Pembroke Dock Marina...which is shrinking significantly in scale as the costs escalate... Gogledd
  • Score: 3

7:07pm Wed 2 Jul 14

Welshman23 says...

Mr Hart and Crabb why do you dig your heads in the sand with the goings on in the Kremlin and the grants issue in Pembroke Dock. Are you frightened to tackle the tough issues in PCC.
Wake up and smell the coffee less than 12 months left before you need to update your CV's. Your days are numbered. Cannot wait.
Mr Hart and Crabb why do you dig your heads in the sand with the goings on in the Kremlin and the grants issue in Pembroke Dock. Are you frightened to tackle the tough issues in PCC. Wake up and smell the coffee less than 12 months left before you need to update your CV's. Your days are numbered. Cannot wait. Welshman23
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree