Different fines leads to question

IN a recent edition of the Western Telegraph’s sister newspaper the Tivy-Side (and online) the headline was ‘Poachers nabbed with a gill net on the river Teifi’. The result was one was given a conditional discharge and one had a formal caution.

Would someone be kind enough to explain why poachers in Pembrokeshire on March 13, 2008 were fined £6,000 for a similar offence?

There seems to be double standards here, maybe your readers could explain?





About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree